By Daily Touch Insights Editorial Team
Editorial Team
View Journalist Profile
SPORTS & FOOTBALL — A major dispute has erupted within Asian football after Asian Football Confederation (AFC) President Sheikh Salman bin Ebrahim Al-Khalifa strongly criticised the Qatar Football Association for challenging the AFC's decision to join a joint letter calling for FIFA President Gianni Infantino to resign.
Sheikh Salman rejected Qatar's claim that he exceeded his authority by joining UEFA and CONCACAF in criticising Infantino. He argued that the AFC president has both the authority and responsibility to act when issues affecting Asian football become serious enough to require a response. 0
The confrontation exposes a growing split within Asian football at a critical moment for FIFA, with Infantino facing an unusually open challenge to his leadership ahead of next year's presidential election.
Qatar Challenged the AFC's Decision
The dispute began after the AFC joined UEFA and CONCACAF in issuing a joint statement attacking Infantino's leadership.
Qatar Football Association President Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani subsequently wrote to the AFC questioning the decision.
He argued that neither he nor the QFA had been consulted before the AFC joined the statement and questioned how the confederation could claim to speak collectively for its 47 member associations without first establishing their position.
The objection placed Qatar directly at odds with the AFC leadership.
Sheikh Salman Rejects Qatar's Argument
Sheikh Salman responded forcefully, saying he “categorically denied” that he had exceeded his mandate.
He argued that the AFC president has a responsibility to protect the interests and values of Asian football and that remaining silent during a major dispute would have been inconsistent with that responsibility.
His response makes clear that the AFC leadership does not accept Qatar's argument that consultation with every member association was required before taking the position.
Asia's Football Leadership Is Becoming Divided
The disagreement is significant because Qatar has been one of the countries supporting Infantino.
Qatar was among six Arab football associations that publicly backed the FIFA president after the collapse of his controversial plan to attract private investment into FIFA competitions.
The other Arab associations supporting Infantino included Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco, Sudan and Mauritania. 3
This means the dispute is no longer simply about procedure.
It reflects a deeper disagreement over the future direction of FIFA and whether Infantino should remain president.
Infantino Faces a Major Leadership Challenge
Infantino is seeking another term as FIFA president, but his position has become significantly more complicated following the collapse of his investment proposal.
UEFA, the AFC and CONCACAF have openly criticised his leadership and called for him to leave office.
The three confederations represent a substantial portion of FIFA's 211 member associations, giving their opposition considerable political weight. 4
However, Infantino continues to have support from other powerful football organisations and national associations.
The Dispute Began With FIFA's Failed Investment Plan
The wider conflict was triggered by Infantino's proposal to attract private investment into FIFA's commercial rights, including rights connected to the World Cup.
The proposed deal was reported to involve the sale of a minority stake in FIFA's tournament commercial rights for billions of dollars.
The proposal generated strong opposition because critics questioned its transparency, governance implications and the process through which the plan had been developed.
Infantino eventually abandoned the proposal, but the political consequences have continued. 5
Qatar Says the Process Matters
Qatar's criticism has focused heavily on the process used by the AFC.
The QFA argued that a collective position should not be assumed simply because the AFC leadership decided to issue a statement.
That argument raises an important governance question: when can a continental football body speak on behalf of its members without first seeking explicit approval from every national association?
The answer could have consequences beyond the current dispute.
Sheikh Salman Accuses Qatar of Selective Criticism
In his response, Sheikh Salman argued that Qatar's procedural objections were inconsistent with its previous behaviour.
He pointed to earlier occasions when AFC leaders had publicly spoken on matters important to Asian football, including support for Qatar's successful bid to host the 2022 World Cup.
He questioned why the QFA had not previously objected to similar procedures when they benefited Qatar.
That accusation has significantly increased the hostility between the two sides. 6
The AFC President Says Silence Was Not an Option
Sheikh Salman's central argument is that the AFC cannot remain neutral when fundamental questions about football governance arise.
From his perspective, the organisation's responsibility extends beyond following administrative procedures.
He believes the AFC must defend the interests and values of Asian football when major issues threaten them.
That position puts him directly against Qatar's interpretation of the AFC's responsibilities.
Qatar's Position Could Influence the FIFA Election
Qatar's support for Infantino could become important during the upcoming FIFA presidential election.
FIFA's president is elected by the organisation's 211 member associations, meaning regional alliances and blocs can have a major influence on the outcome.
Infantino therefore needs to maintain support across multiple continents even as major confederations challenge his leadership.
The growing disagreement inside the AFC could make that task more difficult.
Asia Has Significant Political Weight in FIFA
The AFC represents 47 member associations, making Asia one of the most important voting blocs in world football.
Maintaining unity within the confederation is therefore strategically important for anyone seeking the FIFA presidency.
The current dispute demonstrates that Asian football is far from united on Infantino's future.
Some associations support him, while the AFC leadership itself has now openly criticised him.
The Conflict Could Become Bigger
The dispute between Qatar and the AFC could expand if other Asian football associations take sides.
National associations may be forced to decide whether they support Sheikh Salman's position, Qatar's demand for greater consultation or Infantino's continued leadership.
That could turn what began as a disagreement over procedure into a much wider political contest inside Asian football.
Infantino Still Has Supporters
Despite the rebellion, Infantino's position is not necessarily doomed.
Several national associations continue to support him, including a number of influential Arab football bodies.
The Confederation of African Football has also backed him, while other regions have expressed varying degrees of support or opposition.
The election will ultimately depend on how these competing alliances develop before the vote. 7
The Real Battle Is About FIFA's Future
The argument over the Qatar letter is only one part of a much larger struggle.
At its centre are questions about FIFA's leadership, commercial strategy, transparency and the balance of power between FIFA and the continental confederations.
The failed investment proposal exposed disagreements that had previously remained largely behind closed doors.
Those disagreements are now playing out publicly.
What Happens Next?
The immediate question is whether Qatar and the AFC can prevent the dispute from becoming a permanent division within Asian football.
At the same time, Infantino will need to rebuild support among associations that have questioned his leadership.
The FIFA presidential election will provide the ultimate test of whether the current opposition represents a temporary backlash or a genuine movement capable of removing him.
Our Perspective
The most important lesson from this dispute is that FIFA's leadership crisis is no longer confined to Europe.
It has reached Asia, where the AFC itself is now publicly confronting one of its most influential member associations.
Qatar's procedural argument should not simply be dismissed, because consultation and representation matter in a federation of 47 national associations.
But Sheikh Salman's counterargument is equally significant: a continental body cannot become paralysed whenever a major issue requires a position.
The real test is whether Asian football can resolve the disagreement through legitimate governance rather than allowing the dispute to fracture the continent's influence inside FIFA.
Conclusion
AFC President Sheikh Salman bin Ebrahim Al-Khalifa has strongly rejected Qatar's criticism of his decision to join UEFA and CONCACAF in calling for FIFA President Gianni Infantino to resign.
Qatar had argued that the AFC should not have spoken on behalf of its members without first consulting them. Sheikh Salman responded that he had both the authority and responsibility to act when fundamental issues affecting Asian football arise. 8
The confrontation exposes a major split within Asian football and adds to the growing international challenge facing Infantino ahead of the FIFA presidential election.
What began as a dispute over a letter has become a much larger fight over who speaks for Asian football — and who should control the future direction of FIFA.
