A federal judge has temporarily blocked the White House from enforcing its ban on three news organizations, ordering their press access restored while the legal dispute continues.
U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly has ordered the Trump administration to immediately restore White House access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico. The temporary restraining order blocks enforcement of the ban for 14 days while the court considers the broader legal dispute. Kelly said the news organizations were likely to succeed in showing that their press credentials were revoked without adequate due process and questioned the administration’s national-security justification.
A dispute between the Trump administration and several major news organizations has moved deeper into the courts after a federal judge ordered the White House to restore press access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico.
Judge Timothy Kelly issued the temporary order early Thursday, September 24, after hearing arguments over whether the administration could remove the outlets from the White House grounds because of concerns about their reporting.
The ruling is an interim measure. It does not constitute a final decision on the constitutionality of the administration's policy.
What the Judge Ordered
Kelly ordered the administration to immediately return, reinstate and restore the press access of CNN, MS NOW and Politico. The temporary restraining order is scheduled to remain in effect for 14 days.
The order is designed to preserve the outlets' access while the court examines the underlying lawsuit more fully.
Kelly wrote that the outlets had met the legal threshold for emergency relief and were likely to establish that their press credentials had been revoked without the required due process.
Judge Kelly said the targeted outlets were likely to show that their White House credentials were revoked without adequate procedural protections.
How the White House Ban Began
President Donald Trump announced the restrictions on September 18, accusing CNN, MS NOW and Politico of publishing what he described as false or misleading coverage.
The following day, journalists from the three organizations were denied entry to the White House grounds and their press credentials were confiscated.
The organizations subsequently filed a federal lawsuit challenging the restrictions. They argued that the administration had violated constitutional protections involving freedom of the press and due process.
The Administration's National Security Argument
Justice Department lawyers defended the administration's authority to control access to the White House and argued that national security concerns were relevant to the decision.
The government also argued that access to the White House is a privilege rather than an automatic right.
Kelly, however, said the evidence presented to the court did not adequately support the claim that revoking the journalists' hard passes was necessary to protect national security.
The judge also noted that Trump's own public statements had connected the restrictions to what he regarded as false or negative reporting by the outlets.
Why Due Process Became Central to the Case
The court's decision focused heavily on whether the White House followed the required procedures before taking away the journalists' credentials.
Kelly pointed to previous decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concerning White House press access. He said those precedents require meaningful procedural protections before journalists' access can be revoked.
The judge also criticized the explanations provided by the administration as too vague to establish clear standards for conduct that could justify removing a journalist's credentials.
The case is not only about three press passes. It also raises questions about how government officials can control access to official institutions while journalists are reporting on those officials.
Reporters Were Still Denied Entry After the Order
The dispute did not immediately end with the judge's ruling. Reuters reported Thursday that reporters from CNN, MS NOW and Politico were still being denied access to the White House hours after the order was issued.
Politico said one of its reporters had their credentials confiscated, while MS NOW reported that one of its journalists was blocked from entering. CNN also said some staff members were denied access.
The outlets sought an emergency hearing to address the continued access problems. Reuters reported that it was not immediately clear whether the difficulties reflected a deliberate refusal to comply with the order or problems with the White House entry system.
Other News Organizations Enter the Dispute
The dispute has also affected the broader White House press pool, a rotating group of news organizations responsible for sharing coverage of presidential events when space or logistics limit the number of reporters who can attend.
According to the Associated Press, the five-network television press pool suspended its coverage of Trump's events after CNN was prevented from performing an assigned pool duty.
Other media organizations have also filed legal or supporting documents in the dispute, reflecting broader concerns about the rules governing White House press access.
A Temporary Ruling, Not the End of the Case
Thursday's order does not permanently settle the dispute between the Trump administration and the three news organizations.
The 14-day temporary restraining order gives the outlets access while the court continues considering the underlying constitutional and procedural questions.
The administration can continue to challenge the ruling through the legal process, while the news organizations will continue pursuing their claims that the restrictions violated their constitutional rights.
The case places presidential control over White House access alongside constitutional protections for journalists, creating a legal dispute that could have implications beyond the three organizations involved.
The Fight Over Press Access Continues
The White House and the three news organizations now face a continuing legal battle over who can determine the conditions under which journalists receive access to the president and his administration.
For the moment, Judge Kelly's order requires the administration to restore CNN, MS NOW and Politico's access for the duration of the temporary restriction on enforcement.
The next stages of the case will determine how the court ultimately addresses the constitutional and procedural questions raised by the ban.
Judge Kelly's temporary order restores White House access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico for now, but the larger constitutional dispute over presidential authority, press access and due process is still unfolding in court.
Independent politics, technology, business and global news coverage.
