WORLD NEWS · MIDDLE EAST · MILITARY

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi says Egypt’s military expansion is intended to protect national security, not threaten Israel. Speaking about a past conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Sisi said he expected Israel to view Egypt’s military strength in the same way Cairo views Israel’s capabilities, as tensions continue over regional security and the Palestinian question.

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi has revealed that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu once questioned why Egypt was expanding its military capabilities and purchasing more weapons.

Speaking at a graduation ceremony at Egypt’s Police Academy in New Cairo on October 15, Sisi said he had explained to Netanyahu that Egypt’s military strength was intended to protect the country and preserve peace in a region facing persistent instability.

“Egypt will never pose a threat,” Sisi said, according to reporting by The Jerusalem Post on October 16.

His remarks come amid renewed public discussion about Egypt’s military posture, Israeli concerns about security in the Sinai Peninsula and disagreements over the future of the Palestinians. Although Egypt and Israel maintain a peace treaty, their relationship continues to face pressure from regional conflicts and competing security priorities.

What Sisi Said About Netanyahu

Sisi recounted a previous conversation in which Netanyahu asked why Egypt was arming itself and buying weapons.

According to Sisi, he responded by pointing out that he had never regarded Israel’s military strength as a threat to Egypt. He said he expected Netanyahu to apply the same understanding to Egypt’s armed forces.

The Egyptian president argued that his country operates in a turbulent region and needs sufficient military capabilities to safeguard its borders, protect its interests and maintain stability.

His message was that military strength and peaceful relations do not necessarily have to contradict each other. In Cairo’s view, maintaining a capable military is part of protecting the peace Egypt has with Israel and supporting security across the wider region.

Sisi’s account describes a conversation between the two leaders but does not establish that Israel has formally accepted Egypt’s explanation for its military expansion.

Why Egypt Is Expanding Its Military

Egypt has invested in modernising its armed forces, including acquiring military aircraft, naval vessels, armoured vehicles and other defence equipment. Its military position reflects the country’s size, its long borders, the importance of the Suez Canal and its location between the Mediterranean, the Red Sea and several areas affected by regional instability.

Egypt also faces security challenges connected to militant activity, border protection and instability in neighbouring countries. Its armed forces play a central role in the government’s approach to national security.

However, military expansion can be interpreted differently by neighbouring states. A government may describe new weapons as defensive, while another country may question how those capabilities could be used in a future crisis.

This difference in perception helps explain why military procurement and deployments can become sensitive political issues even when countries maintain formal diplomatic relations.

Sisi’s comments were intended to reassure Israel that Egypt’s military strength should not be interpreted as evidence of hostile intentions. The wider debate, however, involves questions about force deployments, military agreements and how both countries assess potential threats.

Why the Sinai Peninsula Matters

The Sinai Peninsula is a strategically important area of Egyptian territory located between mainland Egypt and Israel. It also borders the Gaza Strip and provides access to routes connecting the Mediterranean and Red Sea regions.

Sinai has particular significance in Egyptian-Israeli relations because it was occupied by Israel during the 1967 war and returned to Egypt under the peace agreement that followed the two countries’ negotiations.

The 1979 Egypt-Israel peace treaty established arrangements governing military deployments and security in the peninsula. These provisions are an important part of the framework that has helped prevent a return to direct war between the two countries.

Questions about military activity in Sinai are therefore especially sensitive. Any dispute over deployments or security arrangements can raise concerns about whether the existing agreements are being respected and whether both sides continue to trust the arrangements.

In recent weeks, Egyptian officials have also responded to comments from Israeli political figures about the possibility of taking control of Sinai if Egypt attacked Israel. Sisi has rejected the suggestion that Egypt has territorial ambitions against its neighbour and has reaffirmed the importance of the peace treaty.

In an October 14 report, Anadolu Agency reported that Sisi said Egypt had no hidden agenda against any country and that its priority was protecting its territory, security and stability.

Egypt and Israel Still Have a Peace Treaty

Egypt and Israel signed their peace treaty in March 1979 following the Camp David Accords of 1978. The agreement ended the state of war between the two countries and established the framework for Israel’s withdrawal from the Sinai Peninsula.

The treaty remains a major element of Middle Eastern diplomacy. It has enabled the two countries to maintain official relations and cooperate on certain security matters despite recurring political disagreements.

Nevertheless, a formal peace agreement does not mean that the two governments share the same regional priorities or that public tensions cannot increase.

The war in Gaza, border security, the future of Palestinian statehood and concerns about possible displacement of Palestinians into Egypt have all contributed to friction between Cairo and Israeli leaders.

Egypt has repeatedly opposed the forced displacement of Palestinians into Sinai, arguing that such a development would threaten Egyptian national security and undermine Palestinian rights. Israel’s security concerns, meanwhile, include preventing attacks and limiting threats along its borders.

These competing priorities make continued communication between the two governments important, even when their public positions differ sharply.

Sisi Links Regional Peace to Palestinian Statehood

During his remarks, Sisi also discussed his longstanding argument that establishing a Palestinian state would contribute to lasting regional stability.

He said he had repeatedly raised the issue with Netanyahu since 2013, arguing that a political settlement for the Palestinians could improve security and make it easier for Israel to integrate into the wider Middle East.

According to Sisi, Netanyahu was not convinced by that argument.

The disagreement reflects a broader divide over how to achieve lasting peace. Egypt has consistently supported a two-state solution, involving an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. Israeli political positions on Palestinian statehood have varied, and Netanyahu has opposed proposals that he believes would threaten Israel’s security.

For Cairo, the Palestinian question is closely connected to Egypt’s own security, particularly because of its shared border with Gaza and the possibility that renewed fighting could create pressure for Palestinians to leave their homes.

The issue also affects Egypt’s diplomatic role in ceasefire negotiations and efforts to reduce the risk of a wider regional confrontation.

Could Military Tensions Threaten Regional Stability?

Military expansion does not automatically mean that a country intends to start a war. However, when neighbouring governments become concerned about each other’s capabilities or intentions, even defensive measures can increase suspicion.

That risk is particularly significant in the Middle East, where several conflicts and competing security interests overlap. Misunderstandings about troop deployments, weapons purchases or political intentions can complicate diplomatic efforts and increase the pressure on governments to respond.

For Egypt and Israel, the existing peace treaty provides a framework for managing security relations. Maintaining communication and respecting agreed arrangements can help prevent disputes from escalating into a direct confrontation.

At the same time, the Gaza conflict and disagreements over the future of the Palestinians remain difficult issues. The stability of Egypt-Israel relations will depend partly on how both governments handle these disputes while protecting their own security interests.

Sisi’s latest comments underline Egypt’s stated position that a strong military is compatible with maintaining peace. Whether Israeli leaders share that assessment remains an important question for the relationship.

Key Facts

  • Egyptian president: Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
  • Israeli prime minister: Benjamin Netanyahu.
  • Main issue: Netanyahu reportedly questioned Egypt’s military expansion and weapons purchases during a past conversation.
  • Sisi’s response: He said Egypt’s military strength is intended to protect national security and preserve peace.
  • Strategic location: The Sinai Peninsula is central to Egypt-Israel border security.
  • Peace treaty: Egypt and Israel signed a treaty in 1979.
  • Palestinian issue: Sisi argues that Palestinian statehood would contribute to regional stability.
  • Current status: The two countries maintain a peace treaty, despite continuing disagreements over regional security and the Palestinians.

The Bigger Picture

Sisi’s account of his conversation with Netanyahu highlights a central challenge in Middle Eastern security: one country’s efforts to strengthen its defences can create concern in a neighbouring country, even when the first government says it has no hostile intentions.

Egypt maintains that its military capabilities are designed to defend its territory and protect peace. Israel’s concerns about regional security, meanwhile, are shaped by its own threat assessments and the changing situation around its borders.

The 1979 peace treaty remains an important framework for relations between the two countries. Preserving that agreement while managing disputes over Sinai, Gaza and Palestinian statehood will remain central to regional stability.

Daily Touch Insights

Independent coverage of technology, business and the digital economy.